WebNov 3, 2016 · Hawkes v. Cuddy & Ors 3 Court: England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Date: Apr 2, 2009 Cited By: 26 Coram: 3 ...deadlock, are sufficient to found both the exercise of the jurisdiction under section 994 and the jurisdiction to wind up on the "just and equitable" ground. WebHawkes v Cuddy. facts which satisfy 994 might not satisfy winding up and vice versa i.e. deadlock not a ground under 994 as it cannot be used as a no fault divorce, unlike under winding up ... Badyal v Badyal 2024. where there is a complete loss of confidence or deadlock and no egregious misconduct from the petitioner, winding up may be the ...
BAILII - England and Wales Cases page 121
WebThe relationship between Hawkes and Cuddy broke down. Hawkes presented a petition under s 459 of the Companies Act 1985 (s 994 CA 2006). He alleged that Cuddy, as a … prohibited person firearms act vic
Hawkes v Cuddy and Others (Nos 1 & 2) - Case Law - vLex
WebFor s.994, it includes cases such as Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries, O'Neill v Phillips, Hawkes v Cuddy (No 2), Saul D Harrison, Re Elgindata Ltd, Re Blue Arrow, Grace v Biagioli, Bird Precision Bellows Ltd, Irvine v Irvine (No 2) and Fulham FC v Richards. WebNov 20, 2008 · Hawkes v Cuddy and Others (Nos 1 & 2) United Kingdom; Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 24 April 2009...in the present case at paragraph 230 and Warren J at paragraph 48 of his judgment in Re Southern Counties Fresh Foods Limited [2008] EWHC 2810 (Ch) expressed doubt as to the correctness of the conclusion of Jonathan Parker J. … WebThe second edition of this highly acclaimed standard reference work on company directors provides analysis of the many important cases which have materially changed the law and provides an update on the myriad of subordinate legislation passed since first publication. prohibited person firearms