Etepha v. director of patents
WebCorp. v. Director of Patents". The Appellant also claims that the ruling of the Supreme Court in Ong Ai Cui v. Director ofPhilippine Patent Office" cited by the Director, far from ... CA,G.R. No. 114508, 19 Nov. 1999, citing Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 (1966), Gabriel v. Perez, 55 SCRA406 (1974). Nestle v. New Zealand Page 3 of8 . WebG.R. No. L-20635, March 31, 1966 ETEPHA, A. G., PETITIONER, VS. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS AND WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N SANCHEZ, J.: To the question: May trademark ATUSSIN be registered, given the fact that PERTUSSIN, another trademark, had been previously registered in the Patent …
Etepha v. director of patents
Did you know?
WebEtepha v. Director of Patents, et al.82 finds application in this case. In Etepha, we ruled that there is no confusing similarity between PERTUSSIN and ATUSSIN. The Court … WebEtepha VS Director OF Patents A case in Intellectual Property Law - ETEPHA, A., petitioner, vs - StuDocu A case digest in Intellectual Property Law with focus on …
WebPerez, 154 Phil. 371 (1974) [Per J. Makasiar, First Division], Etepha, A.G. v. Director of Patents, 123 Phil. 329 (1966) [Per J. Sanchez, En· Banc]. 376 Phil. 628 ( 1999) [Per J. Pono, First Division], / Dissenting Opinion 3 G.R. Nos. 196372, 210224, 216104 & 219632 5 In the Middle Ages, the use of many kinds of marks on a variety of ... WebThe definition laid down in Dy Buncio v. Tan Tiao Bok is better suited to the present case. There, the 'ordinary purchaser' was defined as one 'accustomed to buy, and therefore to some extent familiar with, the goods in question. ... (Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495). The legislature has enacted laws to regulate the use of trademarks ...
WebDec 29, 1995 · 26 Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 (1966). chanrobles virtual law library. 27 Ruben Agpalo, Trademark Law & Practice in the Philippines, 1990, p. 41. chanrobles virtual law library. 28 224 SCRA 437 (1993). chanrobles virtual law library. 29 Co Tiong v. Director of Patents, 95 Phil. 1 (1954); Lim Hoa v. WebSec 123 (and its sub-paragraph), IPC Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 Baxter v. Zuazua, 5 Phil 160 Compania Gral de Tabacco v. Alhambra Cigar, 33 Phil 485 Ang v. Teodoro, 74 Phil 50 (1942) Arce Sons v. Selecta Biscuits, 1 SCRA 253 Kabushi Kaisha Isetan v. IAC, 203 SCRA 583 Asia Brewery v.
WebDirector of Patents.pdf from LAW IP at University of the Philippines Diliman. ETEPHA, A.G. v. DIR. OF PATENTS & WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS Functions of Trademarks …
WebEtepha v. Director of Patents (G. No. L-20635) Issue: Whether or not petitioner’s trademark is registrable. Ruling: YES. That the word “tussin” figures as a component of both trademarks is nothing to wonder at. The Director of Patents aptly observes that it … the hummingbirds daughter pdfWebBrewery, Inc. v. Court of Appeals', Appellant contended that by apPlyir 9 the test of dominancy, the words L.A. and LA, assuming that they are the dominant ... the cases of Etepha v. Director of Patents, et al. 9 (ATUSSIN v. PE TUSSIN), Mead Johnson & Co. v. N.V.J. van Dorp Ltd. 10 (ALASKA v. ALACTA) Cyanamid v. Director of Patents, et al. 11 the hummocks coloradoWebMay 2, 1997 · In Masso Hermanos, S.A. vs. Director of Patents, 94 Phil. 136, 139 (1953), it was held that a dealer in shoes cannot register "Leather Shoes" as his trademark because that would be merely descriptive and it would be unjust to deprive other dealers in leather shoes of the right to use the same words with reference to their merchandise. No one ... the hummock lookoutWebETEPHA VS. PATENTS SANCHEZ, J. G.R. No. L-20635, March 31, 1966 ETEPHA, A. G., PETITIONER, VS. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS AND WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS, … the hummingway mobile alWebPatent in Ethiopia. Patent is a legal form of protection that provides a person or legal entity with exclusive rights to exclude others from making, using, or selling a concept or … the humminguruWebFeb 1, 2024 · Etepha v. Director of Patents, et al. [82] finds application in this case. In Etepha, we ruled that there is no confusing similarity between PERTUSSIN and ATUSSIN. The Court considered among other factors the aural differences between the two marks as follows: 5. As we take up Pertussin and Atussin once again, we cannot escape notice of … the hummocks rhode islandWebView 34 Etepha v. Director of Patents.pdf from LAW IP at University of the Philippines Diliman. ETEPHA, A.G. v. DIR. OF PATENTS & WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS Functions of Trademarks March 31, 1966 the hummingbirds wiki